Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Sunday, Mar 03, 2002

Investment World
Features
Stocks
Port Info
Archives

Group Sites

Investment World - Income Tax
Columns - Tax Talk


Returns and assessments

T. Banusekar

UNDER Section 139(1), every person whose income exceeds the maximum amount not chargeable to tax is required to furnish a return within the due dates stipulated by the Section. It is proposed to insert a new sub-section (1A). By virtue of this sub-section, individuals who have salary income may, at their option, furnish a return of income to their employer.

The employer shall, in turn, furnish the return in electronic form before the due date to the Department. The employee in such cases will be deemed to furnish his return once the employer furnishes the same in electronic form.

It appears that there is no consequence to the employer for not filing the same in electronic form while the employee may suffer a penalty under Section 271F if the employer fails to submit the same in electronic form. This amendment is proposed to be effective from the assessment year 2002-03 onwards.

Penalty for failure to furnish a return: Presently, penalty is leviable under Section 271F to the extent of Rs 5,000 if:

  • A person other than a company whose income exceeds the maximum amount not chargeable to tax or a company fails to furnish a return before the end of the relevant assessment year.

  • A person governed by the proviso to Section 139(1) and required to furnish a return on the basis of satisfying certain economic criteria fails to furnish a return before the due date stipulated under Section 139(1).

    It is proposed that this penalty will be leviable in both the cases only where there is a failure to furnish a return before the end of the relevant assessment year.

    Defective returns: The explanation to Section 139(9) which provides for when a return is defective requires that an assessee must along with his return furnish proof of tax deducted at source failing which the return is defective.

    A proviso is sought to be inserted to provide that the return shall not be defective for failure to furnish a certificate of tax deducted at source where the same has not been received by the assessee provided the certificate is furnished within two years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The amendment it is proposed will be effective from June1, 2002.

    Scrutiny assessment: It is proposed that Section 143(2) be amended to give the power to an assessing officer to scrutinise a return by the issue of a notice under this Section where he has reason to believe that any claim of loss, exemption, deduction, allowance or relief made in the return is inadmissible. This amendment is proposed to be effective from June 1, 2002.

    Consequently Section 143(3) is also to be amended so as to give the power to an assessing officer to allow or reject the claim or claims specified in the notice and make an assessment determining the total income or loss and the sum payable on the basis of such assessment.

    Other amendments: Section 155 gives empowers an assessing officer to amend an order in certain circumstances.

    It is proposed that with effect from June 1, 2002, the power to amend will also include the power to give credit for tax deducted at source where the TDS certificate has not been furnished along with the return but has been furnished before the assessing officer before the expiry of two years from the end of the relevant assessment year.

    A proviso is also to be inserted to clarify that this sub-section shall not apply unless the income from which the tax has been deducted has been disclosed in the return of income of the relevant assessment year.

    It is proposed under Section 50C that the value of consideration be taken as the guideline value for stamp duty purposes.

    Section 155 is to be amended to empower an assessing officer to revise full value of consideration on the basis of the value revised in any appeal, revision or reference under that Act.

    Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

  • Stories in this Section
    Telecom: A breather


    Auto industry: A familiar road
    Large deficits mean higher taxes
    A salaried employee's nightmare
    Cement: Living in derived hope
    Insurance products more pricey
    GIC Fortune `94: Switch
    Alliance Basic Industries: Book profits/Re-enter at lower levels
    Sundaram Balanced Fund: Hold
    Budget: Unintended consequences
    Relief from dividend tax withdrawal
    MF investors in for taxing times
    Tax-savings schemes -- Visible lack of interest
    Petrochemicals: Stress across the board
    Oil: Slippery terrain
    A shot in the arm for MNC pharmas
    Indian pharma cos: Budget pains
    Steel: Docked despite the package
    Hind Lever: Book profits and re-enter
    Henkel SPIC: Hold/Avoid fresh exposures
    Birla 3M: Buy
    ABB: Hold/Buy on declines
    Indian Rayon: Hold
    Indo Matsushita: Buy on declines
    Higher tax surcharge: No major impact
    Tax on dividends: Ouch!
    Tea: This cup runs over
    Tyres: Not a smooth ride
    Liquor: A worrisome brew
    FMCGs: Dividends lose sheen
    Computer hardware: Big boost
    Computer software: Wrong signals
    Aluminium: Hammered
    Copper: A dull shine
    Readymade garments: A better fit
    Dairy products: Milky war
    Housing Fin.: Special treatment
    Savings vs consumption
    Bias for soft rates continues
    Sensex February contract volumes down
    Selling Satyam March 320 calls may pay
    Satyam, Reliance evoke more trading interest
    Options help guide
    Futures guide
    FIs: Focus on IDBI
    HUDCO: Shelter for seniors
    `No incentive to invest or save' — Mr Arun Kejriwal, Director, KRIS
    Book profit in Hindustan Lever
    Reliance upbeat
    Pharma, FMCG scrips in the limelight
    Positive undertone in HPCL
    Nasdaq: Uptrend to continue
    Hammered on rebate and dividends
    Guideline value for computing capital gains
    Interest on housing loan
    Returns and assessments
    Small savers slammed
    Which way to yield?
    Debt, equity, or...
    With perks, tax-free salary is possible too
    As India Inc is pampered: Savers sweat
    Allowing RIL to bid for IPCL -- Why the Govt is wrong
    SQL Star International: Avoid
    JIK Industries: Reject
    It adds up!


    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |

    Copyright © 2002, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line