Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Sunday, Jan 06, 2002

Investment World
Features
Stocks
Port Info
Archives

Group Sites

Investment World - Mutual Funds


US-64: Informed or insider trading by banks?

Suresh Krishnamurthy

IT WAS clear to investors, even from early April 2001, that the repurchase price of US-64 after dividend would be much lower than the repurchase price before dividend. Therefore, it was logical to expect increased redemptions in April and May 2001. But what really happened?

Redemptions in those two months by individual and companies were equally high. However, it is the higher redemptions by companies that is significant. Informed fund managers at many of India's bluechips and banks had remained invested in US-64 despite the justification for exiting from US-64. When these entities rushed to exit in April-May, they raised a few eyebrows.

Interestingly, banks — some state-run too — were also among those that redeemed heavily during those two months. Interestingly, US-64 borrowed from some of these banks to meet the redemption pressure. So, banks that lent to US-64 may have used the information to redeem their investments. If this is so, the banks may be guilty of using material non-public information. Prima facie, a case exists and the onus should be on the banks concerned to prove that their redemptions were a case of informed, and not insider, trading. Unfortunately, not enough light has been thrown on what happened in those two months.

Redemptions over that period are important because much of the deterioration in the US-64 NAV may have happened then. According to the UTI redemptions during April - May 2001 were around Rs 4,100 crore.

So, if the redemptions at Rs 13.50 per unit were made when the NAV was below Rs 10, the impact on the reserves and, consequently, the NAV, would have been adverse. For example, if the NAV then was Rs 9, redemptions amounting to Rs 4,100 crore would have wiped out more than Rs 1,200 crore from the reserves. If the NAV was lower than Rs 9, the impact would have been even worse.

Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section
Forbes Gokak: Accept the higher priced options on last date


Consumer durables: Through the wringer
`If you do not spend, you cannot sell'
Middle-class continues to drive expectations
Drop prices or forfeit growth
All in a whirl

Pioneer ITI Money Market Account: Invest
Tata Pure Equity Fund: Sell
Franklin India Balanced Fund: Hold
Alliance Buy India Fund: Sell
US-64: What investors should do
US-64: Just ignore it
Total lack of accountability
US-64: Informed or insider trading by banks?
Liquid scheme from GIC Mutual Fund
Balaji Telefilms: Pricey now
HFCL: Hold/Avoid fresh exposures
Crisil: Buy
Nifty cos get `one-time' help
TVS Motor Company: Stroke of success
Cadila Healthcare: Buy
Deductions for housing loans and HRA
Timing home loan purchase
Personal loans: `Credit'able options
Bajaj Allianz online travel insurance
PF must build on home loans
Sentiment improves; volumes remain
Markets bullish on index, stock
Nasdaq: Uptrend in force
Big demand for Satyam, Infosys
Futures Guide
Help Guide - Options
Sundaram Finance: Good pick
`Outlook for 2002 is very positive'
Upbeat sentiment prevails at bourses
IT, cement sectors on positive ground
Positive undertone in Satyam
Book profit in ACC, Rolta
For GAIL, DPC stake is not all gas
US-64: Valuable signals for investors
Shadow-boxing on NPAs
US-64: What investors should do
US-64: Just ignore it
Total lack of accountability
Another flat year looms ahead?


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |

Copyright © 2002, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line