Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Friday, Oct 23, 2009
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version | Audio | Blogs

News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Logistics - Roadways
Industry & Economy - Courts/Legal Issues
Conflict of interest: Highways Ministry trying for out-of-court settlement

GVK, Tata Realty unit move court over disqualification.


The NHAI is waiting for implementation of the Chaturvedi Committee’s recommendations.


Mamuni Das

New Delhi, Oct. 22 The Road Transport and Highways Ministry has initiated talks for an out-of-court settlement with GVK and Navinya Buildcon on the conflict of interest issue that is plaguing the highway development programme.

Reliable sources from both the Government and industry have confirmed this to Business Line. But, as the talks are at informal levels and no agreement has been reached yet, people involved in the process are not willing to be quoted.

GVK moved the Delhi High Court, and Tata Realty and Infrastructure Ltd subsidiary Navinya Buildcon the Supreme Court after being disqualified by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) under the conflict of interest clause for certain projects.

The Road Transport Minister, Mr Kamal Nath, had expressed his unhappiness over the impasse.

The NHAI has been shifting the financial bid due dates of projects for about three weeks now.

It is waiting for implementation of the recommendation of the Committee headed by Mr B.K. Chaturvedi, Member, Planning Commission.

The Committee has called for relaxing the clause to 25 per cent levels instead of the current five per cent levels.

In the negotiation with highway developers, the affected parties want a retrospective implementation of the clause, which the Ministry is finding difficult to implement.

“If we implement the clause on a retrospective basis, those who have been awarded the projects may move court,” Mr Nath said recently.

He had earlier said that the Ministry will take a legal view on whether some of the Chaturvedi Committee recommendations can be implemented with retrospective effect.

The conflict of interest clause prohibits competing bidders from having common shareholding of over five per cent at request for proposal levels.

This leaves a lot to interpretation.

For instance, in the Kishangarh-Ajmer-Beawar project, the NHAI forfeited the Rs 14-crore bid security of Navinya-Atlantia consortium because Abertis (a foreign partner of another shortlisted bidder) had 6.68 per cent stake in Atlantia.

This was despite the fact that IDFC-IJM-Abertis did not submit its financial bid in the RFP stage for the project.

In this project, as emerged later, Navinya had the best bid offer for the project.

But the NHAI awarded the bid to the Soma-Isolux consortium after Navinya was disqualified.

In the Kishangarh-Udaipur project, three short-listed consortia of bidders IL&FS Transportation, GVK-Leighton and Oriental Structure Engineers-Gayatri-Continental Engineers have been disqualified under the same clause.

More Stories on : Roadways | Courts/Legal Issues

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Singapore Airlines mulls re-instating capacity for India


FIPB defers Jet Airways’ proposal on issue to FIIs
Wipro forms joint venture with Delhi airport
Work begins to retrieve oil from sunken ship in Paradip
Major container ports register 6.32% fall in handling
Centre to add 700 km of highways annually
Conflict of interest: Highways Ministry trying for out-of-court settlement




The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2009, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line