Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Monday, Dec 10, 2007
ePaper | Mobile/PDA Version


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Home Page - Pharmaceuticals
Industry & Economy - Regulatory Bodies & Rulings
Get Latest BSE Quote
Pharma vigilance panel to decide on controversial drugs

‘Top on the priority list is Rosiglitazone, the formulation for GSK’s Avandia’

Meera Mohanty

New Delhi, Dec. 9 The Pharmacovigilance Advisory Committee is to meet on December 17, over nine months since it met last, to decide the course of action for controversial drugs such as ‘Avandia’ among other issues. The committee was constituted to look into assessment, understanding and prevention of adverse effects of drugs.

“We will be looking at the drugs for which safety concerns have been reported internationally. And top on the priority list is Rosiglitazone, the formulation for GSK’s Avandia,” said Mr M. Venkateswarlu, Drug Controller General of India (DCGI).

GlaxoSmithkline sells the Type 2 diabetes drug under the brand name of Windia in India. The drug called for a ‘black-box’ warning — the US Food and Drug Administration’s severest labelling requirement — for concerns of increased risk of heart attacks. Generic version of the formulation and used in combination are also available from pharmaceutical companies such as Sun, Torrent, Glenmark and Cipla.

Expansion of the panel

Also on the agenda is the expansion of the nearly three-year-old National Pharmacovigilance Programme to another 20 centres, said the DCGI.

Over a period of two years, the 24 peripheral, five regional and two zonal centres, have reported about 7,000 adverse drug reactions (ADRs). “It’s a fraction of the data that India should be collecting,” said a member.

Some of the centres have been given a specific drug to focus on. For instance, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, which is responsible for collecting adverse drug reactions reported for Rosigliatozone, has very few ADRs to cite.

Only 10 per cent of endocrinologists prescribe the drug whose sales have taken a good beating from the bad publicity it has been receiving, according to a doctor.

The insignificant number of ADRs is also due to the fact that doctors are not motivated to report them and fear being affected by the possible bad publicity that it might lead to.

“And quite frankly, where does he have the time when he’s seeing about a hundred patients a day,” he added.

According to a pharmacovigilance programme member several banned or suspended drugs in the past have not been on causality data generated from India, but due to the international hue and cry it has created.

More Stories on : Pharmaceuticals | Regulatory Bodies & Rulings | Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Clasic PNB Viable Vision Hiring

Stories in this Section
Wheat output likely to dip below 70 mt


RCom slams Bharti, Vodafone claims on spectrum
Uniform price for single super phosphate on cards
Reliance third well in Cauvery Basin turns out to be dry
Pharma vigilance panel to decide on controversial drugs
Essar Group places orders for 6 bulk carriers with Chinese co
Today's Pick: Aftek (Rs 82.75)
Day Trading Guide
Year-end break sees more Indians packing up travel bags
Key factors may drive gold to fresh 28-year highs
Bank officers to seek fixed working hours, pension
Benchmarks may consolidate within a range
Sensex will continue to trade high, says FICCI survey
The rediscovery of Jawaharlal Nehru


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line