Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications
Wednesday, Oct 10, 2007
ePaper


News
Features
Stocks
Cross Currency
Shipping
Archives
Google

Group Sites

Industry & Economy - Courts/Legal Issues
Money & Banking - Economic Offences
States - Tamil Nadu
Dishonour of cheque: Acquittal of accused by magistrate not appreciable, says HC

Our Legal Correspondent

Chennai, Oct 9

In a criminal case pertaining to dishonour of cheques filed before the VII Metropolitan Magistrate, Chennai, the Madras High Court has ruled that if the complainant was not present before the Magistrate Court, it was incumbent upon the presiding officer to issue notice to the complainant, and without issuance of such notice, adopting procedure of dismissing the complainant under Section 256(1) of CrPC was not appreciable.

Hearing an appeal from Shalimar Paints Ltd., Chennai, against an order dated 2-12-2006 of dismissal for default, Mr. Justice S. Palanivelu held that the Magistrate should have adjourned the case to some other date to enable complainant to be present before Court, and meanwhile, necessary notice should have been sent to complainant. In these circumstances, the High Court found that legal grounds were available for allowing this appeal.

The appellant had lodged a complaint before Magistrate on the strength of a dishonoured cheque against respondent, Lakshmi Narasimhaswamy Steels & Chemicals, Cuddalore, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The Magistrate dismissed the complaint acquitting accused for non-appearance of complainant. Counsel for appellant, Mr. M. Aravind Subramaniam, quoting a decision of the High Court reported in R Sekar vs S. Rajendran [2004(1) CTC 689] contended that the Magistrate should have adopted a proper procedure, and non-observance of such procedure would tantamount to not rendering proper justice to parties.

The Judge ruled that the above decision could throw much light on the subject. If complainant was not present before court, it was incumbent upon the presiding officer to issue notice to complainant. Adoption of procedure of dismissing complaint was not at all appreciable. The appeal was allowed.

More Stories on : Courts/Legal Issues | Economic Offences | Tamil Nadu

Article E-Mail :: Comment :: Syndication :: Printer Friendly Page



Stories in this Section
Air India seeks fog insurance for 5-month period


‘Jatropha is a viable energy option’
HC stay on Vizag land deal hailed
Dishonour of cheque: Acquittal of accused by magistrate not appreciable, says HC
OECD survey silent on agri reforms
S&P forecasts 8.6% GDP growth for 2007-08
‘Economic growth could reach a sustainable 10%’
Govt hopes to wipe out revenue deficit in 2008-09
No escape from a CRR hike
Employment outlook for Q4 dips
Excise collections up 7.2% in September
‘Great potential to leverage synergies between India and Latin America’
Give infrastructure status to health sector: CII
Cairn starts further drilling in Cambay block
Rupee appreciation takes toll on healthcare sector
NHPC signs pact with BHEL
Revenue from VAT below expectations in TN
Trend offers ‘Free Installation’
SBP offers education loans online
‘Brand India needs to reconcile with realities’
Techtatva at Manipal
Truck manufacturers look at raising prices
Hyderabad to host lab tech meet
Brand building in textiles important, says Plan panel
Unleash a rural revolution, says Pranab
5 banks in AP launch institute to develop entrepreneurship
Kerala, Assam drag down tea production; exports up in Aug
‘Manufacturing units hit by rising rupee, Chinese imports’
IT co offers ayurveda package for employees


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | The Hindu ePaper | Business Line | Business Line ePaper | Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2007, The Hindu Business Line. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu Business Line